Delivered-To Email Header Field
RFC 9228, “Delivered-To Email Header Field”, is an Experimental document published in April 2022 by D. Crocker. The canonical text is published by the RFC Editor.
Abstract
The address to which email is delivered might be different than any of the addresses shown in any of the content header fields that were created by the email's author. For example, the address used by the email transport service is provided separately, such as through SMTP's "RCPT TO" command, and might not match any address in the To: or cc: fields. In addition, before final delivery, handling can entail a sequence of submission/delivery events, using a sequence of different destination addresses that (eventually) lead to the recipient. As well, a receiving system's delivery process can produce local address transformations.
It can be helpful for a message to have a common way to record each delivery in such a sequence, noting each address used in the sequence to that recipient, such as for (1) analyzing the path a message has taken, (2) loop detection, or (3) formulating the author's address in a reply message. This document defines a header field for this information.
Email handling information discloses details about the email infrastructure, as well as about a particular recipient; this can raise privacy concerns.
A header field such as this is not automatically assured of widespread use. Therefore, this document is being published as an Experimental RFC, looking for constituency and for operational utility. This document was produced through the Independent Submission Stream and was not subject to the IETF's approval process.
What “Experimental” means
Describes a specification that is part of a research or development effort, published so the community can gain experience with it.
The canonical text of RFC 9228 is hosted at rfc-editor.org. Available in HTML,TXT,PDF,XML.
- RFC 9227 Using GOST Ciphers in the Encapsulating Security Payload and Internet Key Exchange Version 2 Protocols
- RFC 9229 IPv4 Routes with an IPv6 Next Hop in the Babel Routing Protocol
- RFC 9226 Bioctal: Hexadecimal 2.0
- RFC 9230 Oblivious DNS over HTTPS
- RFC 9225 Software Defects Considered Harmful
- RFC 9231 Additional XML Security Uniform Resource Identifiers
- RFC 9224 Finding the Authoritative Registration Data Access Protocol Service
- RFC 9232 Network Telemetry Framework