Name-Based Service Function Forwarder Component within a Service Function Chaining Framework
RFC 8677, “Name-Based Service Function Forwarder Component within a Service Function Chaining Framework”, is an Informational document published in November 2019 by D. Trossen, D. Purkayastha, A. Rahman. The canonical text is published by the RFC Editor.
Abstract
Adoption of cloud and fog technology allows operators to deploy a single "Service Function" (SF) to multiple "execution locations". The decision to steer traffic to a specific location may change frequently based on load, proximity, etc. Under the current Service Function Chaining (SFC) framework, steering traffic dynamically to the different execution endpoints requires a specific "rechaining", i.e., a change in the service function path reflecting the different IP endpoints to be used for the new execution points. This procedure may be complex and take time. In order to simplify rechaining and reduce the time to complete the procedure, we discuss separating the logical Service Function Path (SFP) from the specific execution endpoints. This can be done by identifying the SFs using a name rather than a routable IP endpoint (or Layer 2 address). This document describes the necessary extensions, additional functions, and protocol details in the Service Function Forwarder (SFF) to handle name-based relationships.
This document presents InterDigital's approach to name-based SFC. It does not represent IETF consensus and is presented here so that the SFC community may benefit from considering this mechanism and the possibility of its use in the edge data centers.
What “Informational” means
Published for the general information of the community. It does not define an IETF standard and carries no standards-track status.
The canonical text of RFC 8677 is hosted at rfc-editor.org. Available in HTML,TXT,PDF,XML.
- RFC 8676 YANG Modules for IPv4-in-IPv6 Address plus Port Softwires
- RFC 8678 Enterprise Multihoming using Provider-Assigned IPv6 Addresses without Network Prefix Translation: Requirements and Solutions
- RFC 8675 A YANG Data Model for Tunnel Interface Types
- RFC 8679 MPLS Egress Protection Framework
- RFC 8674 The "safe" HTTP Preference
- RFC 8673 HTTP Random Access and Live Content
- RFC 8672 TLS Server Identity Pinning with Tickets
- RFC 8671 Support for Adj-RIB-Out in the BGP Monitoring Protocol