Extensions to GMPLS Resource Reservation Protocol Graceful Restart
RFC 5063, “Extensions to GMPLS Resource Reservation Protocol Graceful Restart”, is a Proposed Standard document published in October 2007 by A. Satyanarayana, R. Rahman. It updates RFC 2961, RFC 3473. The canonical text is published by the RFC Editor.
Abstract
This document describes extensions to the Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Graceful Restart mechanisms defined in RFC 3473. The extensions enable the recovery of RSVP signaling state based on the Path message last sent by the node being restarted.
Previously defined Graceful Restart mechanisms, also called recovery from nodal faults, permit recovery of signaling state from adjacent nodes when the data plane has retained the associated forwarding state across a restart. Those mechanisms do not fully support signaling state recovery on ingress nodes or recovery of all RSVP objects.
The extensions defined in this document build on the RSVP Hello extensions defined in RFC 3209, and extensions for state recovery on nodal faults defined in RFC 3473. Using these extensions, the restarting node can recover all previously transmitted Path state, including the Explicit Route Object and the downstream (outgoing) interface identifiers. The extensions can also be used to recover signaling state after the restart of an ingress node.
These extensions are not used to create or restore data plane state.
The extensions optionally support the use of Summary Refresh, defined in RFC 2961, to reduce the number of messages exchanged during the Recovery Phase when the restarting node has recovered signaling state locally for one or more Label Switched Paths (LSPs). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
What “Proposed Standard” means
An entry-level standards-track specification: stable, peer-reviewed and a solid basis for implementation, though it may still evolve before becoming an Internet Standard.
The canonical text of RFC 5063 is hosted at rfc-editor.org. Available in TXT,HTML.
- RFC 5062 Security Attacks Found Against the Stream Control Transmission Protocol and Current Countermeasures
- RFC 5064 The Archived-At Message Header Field
- RFC 5061 Stream Control Transmission Protocol Dynamic Address Reconfiguration
- RFC 5065 Autonomous System Confederations for BGP
- RFC 5066 Ethernet in the First Mile Copper Interfaces MIB
- RFC 5067 Infrastructure ENUM Requirements
- RFC 5058 Explicit Multicast Concepts and Options
- RFC 5068 Email Submission Operations: Access and Accountability Requirements