BGP-4 Implementation Report
RFC 4276, “BGP-4 Implementation Report”, is an Informational document published in January 2006 by S. Hares, A. Retana. The canonical text is published by the RFC Editor.
Abstract
This document reports the results of the BGP-4 implementation survey. The survey had 259 questions about implementations' support of BGP-4 as specified in RFC 4271. After a brief summary of the results, each response is listed. This document contains responses from the four implementers that completed the survey (Alcatel, Cisco, Laurel, and NextHop) and brief information from three that did not (Avici, Data Connection Ltd., and Nokia).
The editors did not use exterior means to verify the accuracy of the information submitted by the respondents. The respondents are experts with the products they reported on. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
What “Informational” means
Published for the general information of the community. It does not define an IETF standard and carries no standards-track status.
The canonical text of RFC 4276 is hosted at rfc-editor.org. Available in TXT,HTML.
- RFC 4275 BGP-4 MIB Implementation Survey
- RFC 4277 Experience with the BGP-4 Protocol
- RFC 4274 BGP-4 Protocol Analysis
- RFC 4278 Standards Maturity Variance Regarding the TCP MD5 Signature Option and the BGP-4 Specification
- RFC 4273 Definitions of Managed Objects for BGP-4
- RFC 4272 BGP Security Vulnerabilities Analysis
- RFC 4271 A Border Gateway Protocol 4
- RFC 4284 Identity Selection Hints for the Extensible Authentication Protocol