MIME-Based Secure Peer-to-Peer Business Data Interchange Using HTTP, Applicability Statement 2
RFC 4130, “MIME-Based Secure Peer-to-Peer Business Data Interchange Using HTTP, Applicability Statement 2”, is a Proposed Standard document published in July 2005 by D. Moberg, R. Drummond. The canonical text is published by the RFC Editor.
Abstract
This document provides an applicability statement (RFC 2026, Section 3.2) that describes how to exchange structured business data securely using the HTTP transfer protocol, instead of SMTP; the applicability statement for SMTP is found in RFC 3335. Structured business data may be XML; Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) in either the American National Standards Committee (ANSI) X12 format or the UN Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce, and Transport (UN/EDIFACT) format; or other structured data formats. The data is packaged using standard MIME structures. Authentication and data confidentiality are obtained by using Cryptographic Message Syntax with S/MIME security body parts. Authenticated acknowledgements make use of multipart/signed Message Disposition Notification (MDN) responses to the original HTTP message. This applicability statement is informally referred to as "AS2" because it is the second applicability statement, produced after "AS1", RFC 3335. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
What “Proposed Standard” means
An entry-level standards-track specification: stable, peer-reviewed and a solid basis for implementation, though it may still evolve before becoming an Internet Standard.
The canonical text of RFC 4130 is hosted at rfc-editor.org. Available in TXT,HTML.
- RFC 4129 Digital Private Network Signaling System /Digital Access Signaling System 2 Extensions to the IUA Protocol
- RFC 4131 Management Information Base for Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification Cable Modems and Cable Modem Termination Systems for Baseline Privacy Plus
- RFC 4128 Bandwidth Constraints Models for Differentiated Services -aware MPLS Traffic Engineering: Performance Evaluation
- RFC 4132 Addition of Camellia Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security
- RFC 4127 Russian Dolls Bandwidth Constraints Model for Diffserv-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering
- RFC 4133 Entity MIB
- RFC 4126 Max Allocation with Reservation Bandwidth Constraints Model for Diffserv-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering & Performance Comparisons
- RFC 4134 Examples of S/MIME Messages