Attaching Meaning to Solicitation Class Keywords
RFC 4095, “Attaching Meaning to Solicitation Class Keywords”, is a Proposed Standard document published in May 2005 by C. Malamud. The canonical text is published by the RFC Editor.
Abstract
This document proposes a mechanism for finding a URI associated with a solicitation class keyword, which is defined in RFC 3865, the No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension. Solicitation class keywords are simple labels consisting of a domain name that has been reversed, such as "org.example.adv". These solicitation class keywords are inserted in selected header fields or used in the ESMTP service extension, including a new \%"No-Solicit:" header, which can contain one or more solicitation class keywords inserted by the sender.
This document specifies an application based on the Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) described in RFC 3401 and related documents. An algorithm is specified to associate a solicitation class keyword with a URI which contains further information about the meaning and usage of that solicitation class keyword. For example, the registrant of the "example.org" domain could use this mechanism to create a URI which contains detailed information about the "org.example.adv" solicitation class keyword. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
What “Proposed Standard” means
An entry-level standards-track specification: stable, peer-reviewed and a solid basis for implementation, though it may still evolve before becoming an Internet Standard.
The canonical text of RFC 4095 is hosted at rfc-editor.org. Available in TXT,HTML.
- RFC 4096 Policy-Mandated Labels Such as "Adv:" in Email Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At Best
- RFC 4094 Analysis of Existing Quality-of-Service Signaling Protocols
- RFC 4097 Middlebox Communications Protocol Evaluation
- RFC 4093 Problem Statement: Mobile IPv4 Traversal of Virtual Private Network Gateways
- RFC 4098 Terminology for Benchmarking BGP Device Convergence in the Control Plane
- RFC 4092 Usage of the Session Description Protocol Alternative Network Address Types Semantics in the Session Initiation Protocol
- RFC 4091 The Alternative Network Address Types Semantics for the Session Description Protocol Grouping Framework
- RFC 4090 Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels